Surely ol' Nessie can't be considered one of the wonders of the world....aren't most of the wonders things which still stand ? Judging by the lack of Nessie sightings, this particular wonder could fizzle out before it becomes officially recognised. If we're gonna go with a mystery monster for such status, then surely Bigfoot ?
The designation as a "wonder of nature" would hang upon whether it exists or not, Nick. IF it were to be officially proven to exist, I would have no problem with inclusion. Heck, even though there's no definite proof, I myself have no problem with this. I believe firmly in it, to be honest. How about also including Sasquatch in there somewhere??? :) Maybe Champ, as well??? :)
From what the article says, I think they are actually talking about making the loch itself a natural wonder of the world, rather than Nessie itself. But, of course, it's difficult to separate Loch Ness from any discussion of the monster, so it may be a moot point!
Surely ol' Nessie can't be considered one of the wonders of the world....aren't most of the wonders things which still stand ? Judging by the lack of Nessie sightings, this particular wonder could fizzle out before it becomes officially recognised. If we're gonna go with a mystery monster for such status, then surely Bigfoot ?
ReplyDeleteThe designation as a "wonder of nature" would hang upon whether it exists or not, Nick. IF it were to be officially proven to exist, I would have no problem with inclusion. Heck, even though there's no definite proof, I myself have no problem with this. I believe firmly in it, to be honest. How about also including Sasquatch in there somewhere??? :)
ReplyDeleteMaybe Champ, as well??? :)
From what the article says, I think they are actually talking about making the loch itself a natural wonder of the world, rather than Nessie itself. But, of course, it's difficult to separate Loch Ness from any discussion of the monster, so it may be a moot point!
ReplyDelete