Love how this guy just shows up and all of a sudden he's an "expert." I guess that if you're that confident of the supposed culprit's population size, its contradictory tendencies of ambulation ("knuckle-walking" vs. bipedalism), the number of toes on its feet (in contradiction to what, maybe > 90% of footprint finds ascribed to Bigfoot) -despite that none of these assertions could be even remotely extrapolated from the single automobile-chewing/scratching incident where no guilty party was identified by physical evidence, tracked, or let alone seen- the facts must be on your side. Pardon the preceding Faulkner-esque diatribe, I'm too exasperated to write more concisely. Thank heaven for investigators like the CFZ, Coleman, Jeff Meldrum, and the more responsible members of the BFRO who have even a smattering of objectivity and/or deference to science.
Love how this guy just shows up and all of a sudden he's an "expert." I guess that if you're that confident of the supposed culprit's population size, its contradictory tendencies of ambulation ("knuckle-walking" vs. bipedalism), the number of toes on its feet (in contradiction to what, maybe > 90% of footprint finds ascribed to Bigfoot) -despite that none of these assertions could be even remotely extrapolated from the single automobile-chewing/scratching incident where no guilty party was identified by physical evidence, tracked, or let alone seen- the facts must be on your side.
ReplyDeletePardon the preceding Faulkner-esque diatribe, I'm too exasperated to write more concisely. Thank heaven for investigators like the CFZ, Coleman, Jeff Meldrum, and the more responsible members of the BFRO who have even a smattering of objectivity and/or deference to science.